7 Comments
User's avatar
Gamster's avatar

Exquisitely cohesive analysis. I need to reread. Your insight is amazing on this area of technology sharing (?). I’ve quickly become a fan❣️Jessica ❣️💖

Jessica Talisman, MLS's avatar

Thank you 💕. So kind !

Marc-Henri Hurt's avatar

And then came « bullshit jobs » :)

Really great essay !

I also wrote some articles on such topics some 10-20 years ago but they were deleted from the same site I mentioned earlier. Not so smartly articulated with knowledge management however, only from an economic point of view.

I also remember there has been a great fashion of « reengineering » in the 90’s and the surge of "The New Economy" in the USA too.

Concerning the difference between processes and procedures, there used to be a kind of hierarchy between the 2, « processes representing chains of operations which trasform an input from a provider into an output to a client », for example a « billing process », and a procedure being for example « handling a particular type of instruction », so more formalized and encoded as you underline it.

Jessica Talisman, MLS's avatar

Thank you, Marc! The hierarchy you describe is very much like the differences between process and procedure. With ontologies, I consider procedure the defined classes and instance data which translates exactly as you describe.

Michael Scharber's avatar

Fantastic gift to your subscribers. Thank you Jessica. Your voice is resonating and greatly appreciated. From a devoted advocate. Cheers!

Jessica Talisman, MLS's avatar

Thank you, Michael! This means a lot:))

David McDonell's avatar

Bravo! This is critical analysis by a highly relevant SME on a foundational tech topic, thank you!

PS- sounds like one of, if not the largest (unintended) technology transfers in world history.